Jaiswal Nears 2,000 Test Runs, Chasing Gavaskar's 49-Year Record in Edgbaston Showdown

Friday - 18/07/2025 04:01
Yashasvi Jaiswal is on the verge of breaking Sunil Gavaskar's 49-year-old record to become the fastest Indian to reach 2000 Test runs. He needs just 97 runs in the upcoming Edgbaston Test against England to surpass Gavaskar, who achieved the milestone in 23 Tests. Jaiswal's recent century in Leeds has fueled anticipation for this historic feat.

Yashasvi Jaiswal, the dynamic Indian opener, stands on the cusp of achieving a significant milestone. He is just 97 runs short of becoming the fastest Indian batsman to reach 2,000 Test runs. This puts him in a position to potentially eclipse Sunil Gavaskar's long-standing record, set 49 years ago.

Yashasvi Jaiswal aims to break Gavaskar's record.

Jaiswal's consistent performance has been a bright spot for India, especially during this period of transition in Test cricket. His recent century in the first Test at Headingley demonstrated his exceptional talent, even though India suffered a five-wicket defeat. Despite setting a challenging target of 371, India was taken by surprise due to remarkable performances by Ben Duckett, Zak Crawley and Joe Root. This resulted in England leading 1-0 in the five-match series.

Team India’s Intense Nets at Edgbaston| Prep for 2nd Test vs England

As India prepares to fight back at Edgbaston, Jaiswal's individual form remains a key source of optimism. In his 20 Tests, he has amassed 1,903 runs at an impressive average of 52.86.

The current record holder, Sunil Gavaskar, reached the 2,000-run mark in his 23rd Test in 1976. Gavaskar became the first cricketer to score 10,000 Test runs. Rahul Dravid and Virender Sehwag follow on the list, achieving the milestone in their 25th Tests.

Jaiswal's elegant strokeplay and composure provide him with the chance to join and even surpass these legends. This could give India a significant boost in the upcoming must-win Test.

Total notes of this article: 0 in 0 rating

Click on stars to rate this article
You did not use the site, Click here to remain logged. Timeout: 60 second